Which word jumps out? |
Maybe it's a little redundant but in an organization our size, bureaucracy will also combat you. My writing generated enthusiasm on our campus and suddenly there was a rash of signs disappearing if they looked unfriendly (i.e. STAFF ONLY on locked doors).
In case being locked wasn't clear enough... |
The next area of resistance is less concrete, but it is everywhere. The constant evaluation of who is deserving of help is pervasive. I've written about it a number of times (including here), but it is worth revisiting. Dr. Donna Beegle is so eloquent at challenging all of us to find our underlying bias when she asks us to imagine what someone has to do to be worthy of your help. This form of resistance is more insidious and subtler. It comes up when people question the sustainability of The Bowl (our lobby snacks), or say things like "couldn't a business sponsor that?" It shows up when they tell me that our mantra "Every Barrier That Can Be Removed Should Be Removed," feels a little too much like "welfare." It shows up in seemingly well-intended conversations about why would you do this just for these students, shouldn't this be for everyone... That last one is particularly challenging because they are right in some sense. We believe that Poverty Informed practice is a form of Universal Design and solving the barriers for #RealCollege students solves things for students in general. But my history and sense of urgency says students in the crisis of poverty can't wait for the world to find universal solutions. For once, the students I'm advocating for get to lead the way, not wait for the rest of the world to be ready to help them. Can you see the subtle judgment within that other approach? So while it is better to fix systems than to fix people, we aren't asking the "people" to wait, at least within the best of our ability. Someday maybe the world will realize our students with the most barriers teach us everything, but until then we will plow the road for them the best we can. So, my advice to anyone working through this issue is twofold. First, give up on the notion of universal acceptance. This work will require upsetting people, and if you can't get comfortable with that, it will be hard. In all honesty, it's my biggest challenge... I like to be liked. Second, openly embrace what you are doing. Belief seems to attract belief and passion seems to attract passion. For everyone who has questioned snack purchases or lack of screening for assistance, there are two people telling me they love their job more than ever, and they feel like they understand our purpose.
I will leave with this. If you want to take on systems, processes, bureaucracy, and implicit bias, you better have reasons that keep you going. I admire the students we serve and personal connections with their stories keep me going. I'm pictured with my friend Emmie.
She shared a lot of her story with me last week on video, and I'll be sharing that soon (I'm not an expert editor, and she gets a chance to review), but I see her at school every day and realize she came back to college after years of homelessness and with barriers most of us would crumble under. But she embodies hope, and I think we owe her every effort to do whatever we can to shrink and remove barriers for her. Emmie is also a recently published poet, and I want to leave you with her poem "I AM." It's worth a reread on the days where the journey to real Poverty Informed practice seems too far. We can't stop. Emmie deserves our best effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment